Make no mistake about. Barack Obama is the most radical abortion extremist that has ever sought the presidency, or any political office in the United States.
Under his presidency you can be guaranteed that he will have an abortion agenda more radical than this nation has seen before. This will be most evident, but not exclusive, to the judges he appoints.
Barack Obama promises to move this country forward. He promises to bring progress. He promises to bring change.
Barack Obama has stated that the first thing he will do as president is to sign the Freedom of Choice Act (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pf0XIRZSTt8). The Freedom of Choice Act, would create a federally guaranteed "fundamental right" to an abortion through all nine months of pregnancy. This is just some of the change and progress the Barack Obama promises. Obama appears posed to pursue infanticideas a fundamental right to American women, essentially marking these children as Lebt Unwürdig Von Lebenc— lives unworthy of life.
It gets worse. We have partial birth infanticide, which is the practice of delivering the human being ¾ of the way feet first, and than jamming a pair of Meyzenbaum scissors into the skull of the baby (which is still in the womb mind you), open the scissors and than proceed to suck the human being’s brains out.
Thankfully, the Supreme Court of the United States of America has upheld the ban on this infanticidal procedure. However, that did not stop Barack Obama from condemning the high court.
“I strongly disagree with today’s Supreme Court ruling, which dramatically departs from previous precedents safeguarding the health of pregnant women. As Justice Ginsburg emphasized in her dissenting opinion, this ruling signals an alarming willingness on the part of the conservative majority to disregard its prior rulings respecting a woman’s medical concerns and the very personal decisions between a doctor and patient. I am extremely concerned that this ruling will embolden state legislatures to enact further measures to restrict a woman’s right to choose, and that the conservative Supreme Court justices will look for other opportunities to erode Roe v. Wade, which is established federal law and a matter of equal rights for women” (http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post_group/ObamaHQ/CZsK).
Now Barack Obama in recent speeches and debates has expressed favor for seeking ways to cut back on abortions without infringing on the woman’s right to infanticide. However, Barack Obama has opposed the Pregnant Women Support Act, which sought to provide coverage of unborn children in the State Children's Health Insurance Program (S-CHIP), and inform women upon their consent about the effects of an abortion one human being who is supposedly Lebt Unwürdig Von Lebenc—lives unworthy of life. Is such an agenda really hopeful, progressive, and the change you want?
Oh and then there is the “Born alive Act.” Barack Obama can be quoted as saying “It mandated lifesaving measures, but also extended ‘personhood’ to pre-viable fetuses, thereby effectively overturning Roe V. Wade.” (Barack Obama, the Audacity of Hope, 132).
This murderous quote is from the monster himself defending his opposition to The Born Alive act, which would have granted personhood to human beings who survived an abortion. It appears as though Barack Obama believes such “pre-viable fetuses” are Lebt Unwürdig Von Lebenc—lives unworthy of life. To be fair I must note that the issue has since become federal law, but it wasn’t at this time and according to prosecutors and the attorney general in Illinois, this practice was legal. However, when Obama, was speaking against it, the practice was legal in his home state.
Mind you, this legislation, contrary to what Barack Obama says only applies to after a failed infanticide! It does nothing for the initial abortion! This legislation came into play because at Christ Hospital, in Chicago, these “pre-viable fetuses” who were born and survived an abortion were discarded like medical waste while alive! For Barack Obama, “a child marked for abortion gets no protection-even ordinary medical or comfort care-even if she is born alive and entirely separated from her mother” (http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/viewarticle.php?selectedarticle=2008.10.14_George_Robert_Obama%27s%20Abortion%20Extremism_.xml)
Why is Barack Obama unwilling to grant basic human rights to a living breathing baby outside the womb? Because they were already marked for abortion and are Lebt Unwürdig Von Lebenc—lives unworthy of life.
Barack Obama argued that “Whenever we define an pre-viable fetus as a person protected by the equal protection clause or other elements of the Constitution, what we’re really saying is, in fact, that they are persons that are entitled to the kind of protections that would provide a child—a nine month old child that was delivered to term.” (Illinois 92 General Assembly, March 31, 2001).
Many Christians and other anti-infanticide citizens believe life begins at conception. But that is not what Barack Obama believes. No. He doesn’t even believe life beings at birth. No he believes being in the womb for 9 months and than being successfully born (not by a failed abortion) is when life truly begins. As a result, one could legitimately question if babies born premature would have a right to life under Obama or if they would be Lebt Unwürdig Von Lebenc—lives unworthy of life.
Make no mistake about. Barack Obama is the most radical abortion extremist that has ever sought the presidency, or any political office in the United States.
Under his presidency you can be guaranteed that he will have an abortion agenda more radical than this nation has seen before. This will be most evident, but not exclusive, to the judges he appoints.
Barack Obama promises to move this country forward. He promises to bring progress. He promises to bring change.
Barack Obama has stated that the first thing he will do as president is to sign the Freedom of Choice Act (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pf0XIRZSTt8). The Freedom of Choice Act, would create a federally guaranteed "fundamental right" to an abortion through all nine months of pregnancy. This is just some of the change and progress the Barack Obama promises. Obama appears posed to pursue infanticideas a fundamental right to American women, essentially marking these children as Lebt Unwürdig Von Lebenc— lives unworthy of life.
It gets worse. We have partial birth infanticide, which is the practice of delivering the human being ¾ of the way feet first, and than jamming a pair of Meyzenbaum scissors into the skull of the baby (which is still in the womb mind you), open the scissors and than proceed to suck the human being’s brains out.
Thankfully, the Supreme Court of the United States of America has upheld the ban on this infanticidal procedure. However, that did not stop Barack Obama from condemning the high court.
“I strongly disagree with today’s Supreme Court ruling, which dramatically departs from previous precedents safeguarding the health of pregnant women. As Justice Ginsburg emphasized in her dissenting opinion, this ruling signals an alarming willingness on the part of the conservative majority to disregard its prior rulings respecting a woman’s medical concerns and the very personal decisions between a doctor and patient. I am extremely concerned that this ruling will embolden state legislatures to enact further measures to restrict a woman’s right to choose, and that the conservative Supreme Court justices will look for other opportunities to erode Roe v. Wade, which is established federal law and a matter of equal rights for women” (http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post_group/ObamaHQ/CZsK).
Now Barack Obama in recent speeches and debates has expressed favor for seeking ways to cut back on abortions without infringing on the woman’s right to infanticide. However, Barack Obama has opposed the Pregnant Women Support Act, which sought to provide coverage of unborn children in the State Children's Health Insurance Program (S-CHIP), and inform women upon their consent about the effects of an abortion one human being who is supposedly Lebt Unwürdig Von Lebenc—lives unworthy of life. Is such an agenda really hopeful, progressive, and the change you want?
Oh and then there is the “Born alive Act.” Barack Obama can be quoted as saying “It mandated lifesaving measures, but also extended ‘personhood’ to pre-viable fetuses, thereby effectively overturning Roe V. Wade.” (Barack Obama, the Audacity of Hope, 132).
This murderous quote is from the monster himself defending his opposition to The Born Alive act, which would have granted personhood to human beings who survived an abortion. It appears as though Barack Obama believes such “pre-viable fetuses” are Lebt Unwürdig Von Lebenc—lives unworthy of life. To be fair I must note that the issue has since become federal law, but it wasn’t at this time and according to prosecutors and the attorney general in Illinois, this practice was legal. However, when Obama, was speaking against it, the practice was legal in his home state.
Mind you, this legislation, contrary to what Barack Obama says only applies to after a failed infanticide! It does nothing for the initial abortion! This legislation came into play because at Christ Hospital, in Chicago, these “pre-viable fetuses” who were born and survived an abortion were discarded like medical waste while alive! For Barack Obama, “a child marked for abortion gets no protection-even ordinary medical or comfort care-even if she is born alive and entirely separated from her mother” (http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/viewarticle.php?selectedarticle=2008.10.14_George_Robert_Obama%27s%20Abortion%20Extremism_.xml)
Why is Barack Obama unwilling to grant basic human rights to a living breathing baby outside the womb? Because they were already marked for abortion and are Lebt Unwürdig Von Lebenc—lives unworthy of life.
Barack Obama argued that “Whenever we define an pre-viable fetus as a person protected by the equal protection clause or other elements of the Constitution, what we’re really saying is, in fact, that they are persons that are entitled to the kind of protections that would provide a child—a nine month old child that was delivered to term.” (Illinois 92 General Assembly, March 31, 2001).
Many Christians and other anti-infanticide citizens believe life begins at conception. But that is not what Barack Obama believes. No. He doesn’t even believe life beings at birth. No he believes being in the womb for 9 months and than being successfully born (not by a failed abortion) is when life truly begins. As a result, one could legitimately question if babies born premature would have a right to life under Obama or if they would be Lebt Unwürdig Von Lebenc—lives unworthy of life.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment